| brianmanzella wrote: |
| Baggar...here ya go
and btw, if this doesn't do for ALL of you...I am at a loss....
Homer wrote that IF you used one ball position, you HAD to change your aiming point. ...OK....I AGREE
BUT....PART of the reason was the LACK of difference between the location(s) between the sweetspots of clubs available BEFORE Homer's passing.
AND...PART of the reason was the different LENGTHS of the clubs...OK?
Are ya'll with me?
Did anyone else see a Paragraph Reference to The Golfing Machine. Did anyone else see one?Well let's START with what Homer has to say...and then deal with what he DIDN'T say....
LACK of sweetspaot location difference:
1984 PING EYE 2 has a CONSTANT sweetspot to shaft centerline relationship.
OK...detractors....book literalist...and jedi...???? (HINT: you should comment on this SPECIFICALLY).
LENTGHS of clubs/COAM Diferences:
Now PART of this equation is the length (I agree) and PART is (or should be) the difference between clubs' moment of inertia and shaft loading and unloading (which is dependent on the shaft's frequency and the unique loading 'times' and types of the player)...
OK...guys....Frequency and MoI matched clubs DID NOT EXIST when Homer passed...please comment specifically.
Now what about this....What if GOLFERS improved more learning ONE ball position than multiple ones (My research Baggar...20 YEARS all levels...tour wins...so-called UNFIXABLE Hackers, slicers, etc.)...what about the DIVOT you would take if you got to low point with this back ball position and what about the face that the only TWO GSED's that I asked...Who don't agree on a whole bunch of things...agree on this?? Huh? response on THIS specifically.
And finally what about the differneces in AIMING with the mulitple positions and the constant forward one?
?
And also...why in the heck would REAL WORLD EXPERIENCE with the book's concepts be unimportant in this discussion?? |
"Science takes the 'seems as if' outof things."
-- Homer Kelley (Preface)
In the above quoted 'argument,' did anyone else see a Paragraph Reference to TheGolfing Machine? Absent that, did anyone else see any logical argumentsupported by scientific proof? And did anyone else happen to notice that Brianis now 'agreeing' that you must change the Aiming Point when you use thesame Ball Location with various length Clubs, a point he specificallydenied in a previous post -- still on-line for the curious -- a coupleof weeks ago?
Alas, the definition of insanity is to expect rational conversation with irrationalpeople.